It seems that information keeps surfacing that makes AKA seem guilty. Other than Nadia herself denying that AKA assaulted her, other sources beg to differ.
READ HERE- Nadia Nakai Broke a Friendship for a 5min Relationship!
A statement from the Daily Sun claims that AKA assaulted Nadia in a public venue in Ghana. Just two days ago AKA and Nadia sued the publication for R800 000.
https://www.instagram.com/p/Ccj_tzYMTd2/
Daily Sun then allegedly reached out to Moonchild who was in the surrounding area when the argument unfolded. Moonchild said “No Comment.” So here’s the thing, If Moonchild knew for a fact that Nadia did not get assaulted it is easy for her to squash the rumors by saying “Nothing happened” or even back up Nadia’s story.
Saying “No comment” makes it seem as if she knows something but prefers to keep quiet. I mean if the alleged victim is staying silent why would you want to be a witness…
According to sources an anonymous friend of Nadia allegedly came out with a statement saying “When he arrived at the hotel, he went into a room where she was chilling with other people and allegedly attacked the promoter who had booked them.”

The friend added “He allegedly punched him several times and then went back to Nadia. He had to be restrained and once calm, he broke down and cried.”
But all this means nothing because Nadia says “It never happened. I was not assaulted in any way. We just got into an argument and that is all.”
What are your thoughts… Is AKA just being framed or is there a possibility that …








